BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1021
Utility
- power
- 21.1 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1021 vs John Deere MT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere MT
Row Crop
- power
- 20.8 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT1021
vs
John DeereJohn Deere MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT1021 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)CT102121.1 hp
MT20.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1021 is in the 10th percentile; MT is in the 9th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT higher · +31.9 ci (+46%)CT102169.1 ci
MT101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1021 is in the 10th percentile; MT is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT1021 higher · +1 (+50%)CT10213
MT2
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1021 is in the 23rd percentile; MT is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT higher · +1,745 lb (+117%)CT10211,488 lb
MT3,233 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1021 is in the 5th percentile; MT is in the 26th · 5,107 models
CT1021 (A)MT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | John Deere | — |
| Model | CT1021 | MT | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | John Deere | — |
| Model | S733L | John Deere | — |
| Power Output | 21.1hp | 20.8hp | ▲ CT1021+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 1,650RPM | ▲ CT1021+1,350 RPM · +82% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT1021+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 101ci | ▲ MT+31.9 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 3in | 4in | ▲ MT+1 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4in | ▲ MT+0.8 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 125in | ▲ MT+25.7 in · +26% |
| Width | 46in | 89.4in | ▲ MT+43.4 in · +94% |
| Height | 87.6in | 58.7in | ▲ CT1021+28.9 in · +49% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,233lb | ▲ MT+1,745 lb · +117% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Lift Control | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 550rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Single Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 10th percentile (21.1 hp)B · 9th percentile (20.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,233 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 34th percentile (125 in)
A · CT1021B · MTMedian Utility Tractor