BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1021
Utility
- power
- 21.1 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Bobcat CT1021 vs Mitsubishi MT210
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT210
Sub-Compact
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- 59.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT1021
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ CT1021 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)CT102121.1 hp
MT21021 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
CT1021 is in the 29th percentile; MT210 is in the 28th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1021 higher · +9.4 ci (+16%)CT102169.1 ci
MT21059.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
CT1021 is in the 33rd percentile; MT210 is in the 18th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10213
MT2103
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
CT1021 is in the 50th percentile; MT210 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT210 higher · +232 lb (+16%)CT10211,488 lb
MT2101,720 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
CT1021 is in the 22nd percentile; MT210 is in the 31st · 711 models
CT1021 (A)MT210 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT1021 | MT210 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | S733L | K3D | — |
| Power Output | 21.1hp | 21hp | ▲ CT1021+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ CT1021+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 59.7ci | ▲ CT1021+9.4 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3in | 2.9in | ▲ CT1021+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.1in | ▲ CT1021+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 102in | ▲ MT210+2.7 in · +3% |
| Width | 46in | 44.1in | ▲ CT1021+1.9 in · +4% |
| Height | 87.6in | 53.3in | ▲ CT1021+34.3 in · +64% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,720lb | ▲ MT210+232 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 29th percentile (21.1 hp)B · 28th percentile (21 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 33rd percentile (69.1 ci)B · 18th percentile (59.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 22nd percentile (1,488 lb)B · 31st percentile (1,720 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 29th percentile (99.3 in)B · 33rd percentile (102 in)
A · CT1021B · MT210Median Sub-Compact Tractor