BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Bobcat CT1025 vs Bobcat CT2535
Image not recorded
BobcatModel B
Bobcat CT2535
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34.9 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
BobcatBobcat CT2535
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ CT2535 higher · +10.4 hp (+42%)CT102524.5 hp
CT253534.9 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
CT1025 is in the 42nd percentile; CT2535 is in the 64th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT2535 higher · +41.9 ci (+61%)CT102569.1 ci
CT2535111 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
CT1025 is in the 33rd percentile; CT2535 is in the 64th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
CT25353
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
CT1025 is in the 50th percentile; CT2535 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT2535 higher · +1,909 lb (+128%)CT10251,488 lb
CT25353,397 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
CT1025 is in the 22nd percentile; CT2535 is in the 64th · 711 models
CT1025 (A)CT2535 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Bobcat | Same |
| Model | CT1025 | CT2535 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Daedong | Same |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | 3F-TM | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 34.9hp | ▲ CT2535+10.4 hp · +42% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ CT1025+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 111ci | ▲ CT2535+41.9 ci · +61% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.4in | ▲ CT2535+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4in | ▲ CT2535+0.8 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 121in | ▲ CT2535+21.7 in · +22% |
| Width | 46in | 56in | ▲ CT2535+10 in · +22% |
| Height | 87.6in | 91.7in | ▲ CT2535+4.1 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,397lb | ▲ CT2535+1,909 lb · +128% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Rear: Type I | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 42nd percentile (24.5 hp)B · 64th percentile (34.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 33rd percentile (69.1 ci)B · 64th percentile (111 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 22nd percentile (1,488 lb)B · 64th percentile (3,397 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 29th percentile (99.3 in)B · 60th percentile (121 in)
A · CT1025B · CT2535Median Sub-Compact Tractor