BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs CaseIH DX25E
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH DX25E
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
CaseIHCaseIH DX25E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ DX25E higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
DX25E25 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; DX25E is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +7.8 ci (+13%)CT102569.1 ci
DX25E61.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; DX25E is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
DX25E3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; DX25E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT1025 higher · +170 lb (+13%)CT10251,488 lb
DX25E1,318 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; DX25E is in the 3rd · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)DX25E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT1025 | DX25E | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | S773 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ DX25E+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 61.3ci | ▲ CT1025+7.8 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 3in | 3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ CT1025+0.4 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 96.1in | ▲ CT1025+3.2 in · +3% |
| Width | 46in | 45.7in | ▲ CT1025+0.3 in · <1% |
| Height | 87.6in | 89.8in | ▲ DX25E+2.2 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,318lb | ▲ CT1025+170 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 699lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,318 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 7th percentile (96.1 in)
A · CT1025B · DX25EMedian Utility Tractor