BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Bobcat CT1025 vs CaseIH Farmall 25SC
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 25SC
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 25SC
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 25SC higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)CT102524.5 hp
Farmall 25SC24.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
CT1025 is in the 42nd percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 43rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 25SC higher · +8.1 ci (+12%)CT102569.1 ci
Farmall 25SC77.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
CT1025 is in the 33rd percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 37th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
Farmall 25SC3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
CT1025 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT1025 higher · +44 lb (+3%)CT10251,488 lb
Farmall 25SC1,444 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
CT1025 is in the 22nd percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 19th · 711 models
CT1025 (A)Farmall 25SC (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT1025 | Farmall 25SC | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.7hp | ▲ Farmall 25SC+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 77.2ci | ▲ Farmall 25SC+8.1 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.2in | ▲ Farmall 25SC+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.3in | ▲ Farmall 25SC+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 97in | ▲ CT1025+2.3 in · +2% |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | 87.4in | ▲ CT1025+0.2 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,444lb | ▲ CT1025+44 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375), Mid PTO 2500 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Type I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 42nd percentile (24.5 hp)B · 43rd percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 33rd percentile (69.1 ci)B · 37th percentile (77.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 22nd percentile (1,488 lb)B · 19th percentile (1,444 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 29th percentile (99.3 in)B · 25th percentile (97 in)
A · CT1025B · Farmall 25SCMedian Sub-Compact Tractor