BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs CaseIH Farmall DX25E
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX25E
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX25E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall DX25E higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
Farmall DX25E25 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; Farmall DX25E is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +7.8 ci (+13%)CT102569.1 ci
Farmall DX25E61.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; Farmall DX25E is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
Farmall DX25E3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX25E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT1025 higher · +165 lb (+12%)CT10251,488 lb
Farmall DX25E1,323 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; Farmall DX25E is in the 3rd · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)Farmall DX25E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT1025 | Farmall DX25E | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | ISM-S773 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ Farmall DX25E+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 61.3ci | ▲ CT1025+7.8 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 3in | 3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ CT1025+0.4 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,323lb | ▲ CT1025+165 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,323 lb)
A · CT1025B · Farmall DX25EMedian Utility Tractor