BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Cub Cadet 7252
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet 7252
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 45.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7252
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7252 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
725225 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; 7252 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +23.5 ci (+52%)CT102569.1 ci
725245.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; 7252 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT1025 higher · +1 (+50%)CT10253
72522
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; 7252 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7252 higher · +109 lb (+7%)CT10251,488 lb
72521,597 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; 7252 is in the 7th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)7252 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | CT1025 | 7252 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Kawasaki | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | FD750 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ 7252+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,600RPM | ▲ 7252+600 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT1025+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 45.6ci | ▲ CT1025+23.5 ci · +52% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ 7252+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.1in | ▲ CT1025+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 91in | ▲ CT1025+8.3 in · +9% |
| Width | 46in | 48in | ▲ 7252+2 in · +4% |
| Height | 87.6in | 53in | ▲ CT1025+34.6 in · +65% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,597lb | ▲ 7252+109 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center Gear Pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 0.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 2nd percentile (45.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 7th percentile (1,597 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 4th percentile (91 in)
A · CT1025B · 7252Median Utility Tractor