BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Cub Cadet SLT1550
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet SLT1550
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 44.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet SLT1550
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ SLT1550 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
SLT155025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; SLT1550 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +24.9 ci (+56%)CT102569.1 ci
SLT155044.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; SLT1550 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT1025 higher · +1 (+50%)CT10253
SLT15502
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; SLT1550 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT1025 higher · +937 lb (+170%)CT10251,488 lb
SLT1550551 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; SLT1550 is in the 1st · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)SLT1550 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | CT1025 | SLT1550 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Kohler | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Courage SV730 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ SLT1550+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,375RPM | ▲ SLT1550+375 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT1025+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 44.2ci | ▲ CT1025+24.9 ci · +56% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ SLT1550+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.6in | ▲ CT1025+0.6 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 67.7in | ▲ CT1025+31.6 in · +47% |
| Width | 46in | 53.9in | ▲ SLT1550+7.9 in · +17% |
| Height | 87.6in | 42.9in | ▲ CT1025+44.7 in · +104% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 551lb | ▲ CT1025+937 lb · +170% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with electric clutch | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Dry disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet SLT1550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 2nd percentile (44.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 1st percentile (551 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 1st percentile (67.7 in)
A · CT1025B · SLT1550Median Utility Tractor