BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Cub Cadet XT1 GT50
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet XT1 GT50
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 24.9 hp
- displacement
- 44.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet XT1 GT50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ XT1 GT50 higher · +0.4 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
XT1 GT5024.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; XT1 GT50 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +24.9 ci (+56%)CT102569.1 ci
XT1 GT5044.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; XT1 GT50 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT1025 higher · +1 (+50%)CT10253
XT1 GT502
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; XT1 GT50 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT1025 higher · +959 lb (+181%)CT10251,488 lb
XT1 GT50529 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; XT1 GT50 is in the 1st · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)XT1 GT50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | CT1025 | XT1 GT50 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Kohler | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | KT740 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.9hp | ▲ XT1 GT50+0.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,600RPM | ▲ XT1 GT50+600 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT1025+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 44.2ci | ▲ CT1025+24.9 ci · +56% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ XT1 GT50+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.6in | ▲ CT1025+0.6 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Belt-driven hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 72.4in | ▲ CT1025+26.9 in · +37% |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | 44.5in | ▲ CT1025+43.1 in · +97% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 529lb | ▲ CT1025+959 lb · +181% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with manual clutch | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16x6.5 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 22x9.5 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Cub Cadet XT1 GT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (24.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 2nd percentile (44.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 1st percentile (529 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 1st percentile (72.4 in)
A · CT1025B · XT1 GT50Median Utility Tractor