BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Farmall 230
FarmallModel B
Farmall 230
Row Crop
- power
- 24.9 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
FarmallFarmall 230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 230 higher · +0.4 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
23024.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; 230 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 230 higher · +53.9 ci (+78%)CT102569.1 ci
230123 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; 230 is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 230 higher · +1 (+33%)CT10253
2304
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; 230 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 230 higher · +1,952 lb (+131%)CT10251,488 lb
2303,440 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; 230 is in the 29th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)230 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT1025 | 230 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | C123 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.9hp | ▲ 230+0.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ CT1025+1,200 RPM · +67% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 230+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 123ci | ▲ 230+53.9 ci · +78% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ 230+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4.7in | ▲ 230+1.5 in · +47% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,440lb | ▲ 230+1,952 lb · +131% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.00-15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2-36 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical dry disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (24.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 30th percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 29th percentile (3,440 lb)
A · CT1025B · 230Median Utility Tractor