BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Farmall Super FC
FarmallModel B
Farmall Super FC
Utility
- power
- 25.6 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
FarmallFarmall Super FC
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Super FC higher · +1.1 hp (+4%)CT102524.5 hp
Super FC25.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; Super FC is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Super FC higher · +53.9 ci (+78%)CT102569.1 ci
Super FC123 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; Super FC is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Super FC higher · +1 (+33%)CT10253
Super FC4
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; Super FC is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Length
▲ Super FC higher · +30.7 in (+31%)CT102599.3 in
Super FC130 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
CT1025 is in the 8th percentile; Super FC is in the 40th · 4,659 models
CT1025 (A)Super FC (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT1025 | Super FC | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25.6hp | ▲ Super FC+1.1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 1,650RPM | ▲ CT1025+1,350 RPM · +82% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Super FC+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 123ci | ▲ Super FC+53.9 ci · +78% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ Super FC+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4in | ▲ Super FC+0.8 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 130in | ▲ Super FC+30.7 in · +31% |
| Width | 46in | 78in | ▲ Super FC+32 in · +70% |
| Height | 87.6in | 83.1in | ▲ CT1025+4.5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | IH Touch Control | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Farmall Super FC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.3gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 30th percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 40th percentile (130 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 12th percentile (46 in)B · 78th percentile (78 in)
A · CT1025B · Super FCMedian Utility Tractor