BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Ford 9N
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
FordFord 9N
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9N higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
9N25.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; 9N is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9N higher · +50.9 ci (+74%)CT102569.1 ci
9N120 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; 9N is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9N higher · +1 (+33%)CT10253
9N4
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; 9N is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9N higher · +2,088 lb (+140%)CT10251,488 lb
9N3,576 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; 9N is in the 30th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)9N (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Ford | — |
| Model | CT1025 | 9N | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Ford | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25.1hp | ▲ 9N+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,001RPM | ▲ CT1025+999 RPM · +50% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 9N+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 120ci | ▲ 9N+50.9 ci · +74% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.2in | ▲ 9N+0.2 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.8in | ▲ 9N+0.6 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 115in | ▲ 9N+15.7 in · +16% |
| Width | 46in | 64in | ▲ 9N+18 in · +39% |
| Height | 87.6in | 52in | ▲ CT1025+35.6 in · +68% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,576lb | ▲ 9N+2,088 lb · +140% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 558rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 4.00x19 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 10.00x28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 798lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 28th percentile (120 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 30th percentile (3,576 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · CT1025B · 9NMedian Utility Tractor