BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Bobcat CT1025 vs Jinma JM-250
Image not recorded
JinmaModel B
Jinma JM-250
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 93.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
JinmaJinma JM-250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ JM-250 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
JM-25025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
CT1025 is in the 42nd percentile; JM-250 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ JM-250 higher · +24.4 ci (+35%)CT102569.1 ci
JM-25093.5 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
CT1025 is in the 33rd percentile; JM-250 is in the 53rd · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
JM-2503
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
CT1025 is in the 50th percentile; JM-250 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ JM-250 higher · +1,147 lb (+77%)CT10251,488 lb
JM-2502,635 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
CT1025 is in the 22nd percentile; JM-250 is in the 49th · 711 models
CT1025 (A)JM-250 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Jinma | — |
| Model | CT1025 | JM-250 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Jinma | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ JM-250+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ CT1025+700 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 93.5ci | ▲ JM-250+24.4 ci · +35% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ JM-250+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.5in | ▲ JM-250+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 112in | ▲ JM-250+12.7 in · +13% |
| Width | 46in | 56.7in | ▲ JM-250+10.7 in · +23% |
| Height | 87.6in | 52in | ▲ CT1025+35.6 in · +68% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,635lb | ▲ JM-250+1,147 lb · +77% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Jinma JM-250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.1gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 42nd percentile (24.5 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 33rd percentile (69.1 ci)B · 53rd percentile (93.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 22nd percentile (1,488 lb)B · 49th percentile (2,635 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 29th percentile (99.3 in)B · 48th percentile (112 in)
A · CT1025B · JM-250Median Sub-Compact Tractor