BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Lanz Bulldog D7500
Image not recorded
LanzModel B
Lanz Bulldog D7500
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 287 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 3
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
LanzLanz Bulldog D7500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT102524.5 hp
Bulldog D750024.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; Bulldog D7500 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Bulldog D7500 higher · +218 ci (+315%)CT102569.1 ci
Bulldog D7500287 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; Bulldog D7500 is in the 83rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT1025 higher · +2 (+200%)CT10253
Bulldog D75001
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; Bulldog D7500 is in the 1st · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Bulldog D7500 higher · +3,362 lb (+226%)CT10251,488 lb
Bulldog D75004,850 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; Bulldog D7500 is in the 46th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)Bulldog D7500 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Lanz | — |
| Model | CT1025 | Bulldog D7500 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Lanz | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.5hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 850RPM | ▲ CT1025+2,150 RPM · +253% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 1 | ▲ CT1025+2 · +200% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 287ci | ▲ Bulldog D7500+218 ci · +315% |
| Bore | 3in | 6.7in | ▲ Bulldog D7500+3.7 in · +123% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 8.3in | ▲ Bulldog D7500+5.1 in · +159% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 108in | ▲ Bulldog D7500+8.7 in · +9% |
| Width | 46in | 61.8in | ▲ Bulldog D7500+15.8 in · +34% |
| Height | 87.6in | 79.3in | ▲ CT1025+8.3 in · +10% |
| Ground Clearance | Not recorded | 11.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 4,850lb | ▲ Bulldog D7500+3,362 lb · +226% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz Bulldog D7500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.9gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 83rd percentile (287 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 1st percentile (1)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,850 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 14th percentile (108 in)
A · CT1025B · Bulldog D7500Median Utility Tractor