BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Massey Ferguson 1225
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1225
Utility
- power
- 24.3 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1225
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT1025 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)CT102524.5 hp
122524.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; 1225 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +0.6 ci (<1%)CT102569.1 ci
122568.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; 1225 is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
12253
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; 1225 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT1025 higher · +121 lb (+9%)CT10251,488 lb
12251,367 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; 1225 is in the 4th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)1225 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | CT1025 | 1225 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Iseki | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | E3112 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.3hp | ▲ CT1025+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ CT1025+200 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 68.5ci | ▲ CT1025+0.6 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ 1225+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.1in | ▲ CT1025+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 91.1in | ▲ CT1025+8.2 in · +9% |
| Width | 46in | 41in | ▲ CT1025+5 in · +12% |
| Height | 87.6in | 75.2in | ▲ CT1025+12.4 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,367lb | ▲ CT1025+121 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,213lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Mechanical dry shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 1225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 4th percentile (1,367 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 5th percentile (91.1 in)
A · CT1025B · 1225Median Utility Tractor