BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Massey Ferguson 825
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 825
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 825
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 825 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
82525 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; 825 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 825 higher · +37.9 ci (+55%)CT102569.1 ci
825107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; 825 is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 825 higher · +1 (+33%)CT10253
8254
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; 825 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 825 higher · +1,627 lb (+109%)CT10251,488 lb
8253,115 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; 825 is in the 24th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)825 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | CT1025 | 825 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Perkins | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ 825+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 825+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 107ci | ▲ 825+37.9 ci · +55% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ 825+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.5in | ▲ 825+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,115lb | ▲ 825+1,627 lb · +109% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson 825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,115 lb)
A · CT1025B · 825Median Utility Tractor