BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Mitsubishi GS250
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GS250
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GS250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GS250 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)CT102524.5 hp
GS25024.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; GS250 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GS250 higher · +11.3 ci (+16%)CT102569.1 ci
GS25080.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; GS250 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
GS2503
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; GS250 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ GS250 higher · +474 lb (+32%)CT10251,488 lb
GS2501,962 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; GS250 is in the 11th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)GS250 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT1025 | GS250 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.7hp | ▲ GS250+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ CT1025+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 80.4ci | ▲ GS250+11.3 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ GS250+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.6in | ▲ GS250+0.4 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 107in | ▲ GS250+7.7 in · +8% |
| Width | 46in | 45.3in | ▲ CT1025+0.7 in · +2% |
| Height | 87.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,962lb | ▲ GS250+474 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | JIS0 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS and Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 11th percentile (1,962 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 13th percentile (107 in)
A · CT1025B · GS250Median Utility Tractor