BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Mitsubishi GSK250
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GSK250
Crawler
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GSK250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GSK250 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)CT102524.5 hp
GSK25024.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; GSK250 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GSK250 higher · +22.3 ci (+32%)CT102569.1 ci
GSK25091.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; GSK250 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
GSK2503
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; GSK250 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ GSK250 higher · +1,323 lb (+89%)CT10251,488 lb
GSK2502,811 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; GSK250 is in the 20th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)GSK250 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT1025 | GSK250 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Isuzu | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | E3CD | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.7hp | ▲ GSK250+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT1025+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 91.4ci | ▲ GSK250+22.3 ci · +32% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.4in | ▲ GSK250+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.4in | ▲ GSK250+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 46in | 56.3in | ▲ GSK250+10.3 in · +22% |
| Height | 87.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,811lb | ▲ GSK250+1,323 lb · +89% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | JIS0 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Half-track | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 20th percentile (2,811 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 12th percentile (46 in)B · 31st percentile (56.3 in)
A · CT1025B · GSK250Median Utility Tractor