BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Mitsubishi MT2501
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT2501
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 86.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT2501
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT2501 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)CT102524.5 hp
MT250124.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; MT2501 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT2501 higher · +17.3 ci (+25%)CT102569.1 ci
MT250186.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; MT2501 is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT2501 higher · +1 (+33%)CT10253
MT25014
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; MT2501 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT2501 higher · +783 lb (+53%)CT10251,488 lb
MT25012,271 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; MT2501 is in the 14th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)MT2501 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT2501 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT1025 | MT2501 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT2501 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | K4E | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.7hp | ▲ MT2501+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ CT1025+600 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT2501+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 86.4ci | ▲ MT2501+17.3 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT2501 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT2501 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 116in | ▲ MT2501+16.7 in · +17% |
| Width | 46in | 51.6in | ▲ MT2501+5.6 in · +12% |
| Height | 87.6in | 78in | ▲ CT1025+9.6 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,271lb | ▲ MT2501+783 lb · +53% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT2501 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | JIS1 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT2501 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT2501 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 15th percentile (86.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,271 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 21st percentile (116 in)
A · CT1025B · MT2501Median Utility Tractor