BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Mitsubishi MT251
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT251
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT251
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT251 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)CT102524.5 hp
MT25124.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; MT251 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT251 higher · +22.4 ci (+32%)CT102569.1 ci
MT25191.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; MT251 is in the 20th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT251 higher · +1 (+33%)CT10253
MT2514
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; MT251 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT251 higher · +1,334 lb (+90%)CT10251,488 lb
MT2512,822 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; MT251 is in the 20th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)MT251 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT1025 | MT251 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | S4L | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.7hp | ▲ MT251+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT1025+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT251+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 91.5ci | ▲ MT251+22.4 ci · +32% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ MT251+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.1in | ▲ CT1025+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 124in | ▲ MT251+24.7 in · +25% |
| Width | 46in | 53.4in | ▲ MT251+7.4 in · +16% |
| Height | 87.6in | 76.2in | ▲ CT1025+11.4 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,822lb | ▲ MT251+1,334 lb · +90% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14-Jul | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | JISI | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT251 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS (Roll-Over Protection Structure) available, Cab available | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 20th percentile (2,822 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 32nd percentile (124 in)
A · CT1025B · MT251Median Utility Tractor