BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs New Holland TC25
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TC25
Utility
- power
- 24.9 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
New HollandNew Holland TC25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TC25 higher · +0.4 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
TC2524.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; TC25 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TC25 higher · +12.1 ci (+18%)CT102569.1 ci
TC2581.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; TC25 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
TC253
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; TC25 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ TC25 higher · +849 lb (+57%)CT10251,488 lb
TC252,337 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; TC25 is in the 15th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)TC25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | New Holland | — |
| Model | CT1025 | TC25 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Shibura | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.9hp | ▲ TC25+0.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ CT1025+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 81.2ci | ▲ TC25+12.1 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ TC25+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.2in | ▲ CT1025+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear type | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 106in | ▲ TC25+6.7 in · +7% |
| Width | 46in | 53.9in | ▲ TC25+7.9 in · +17% |
| Height | 87.6in | 87.8in | ▲ TC25+0.2 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,337lb | ▲ TC25+849 lb · +57% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,634lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | New Holland TC25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (24.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,337 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 13th percentile (106 in)
A · CT1025B · TC25Median Utility Tractor