BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Satoh Bison S650
SatohModel B
Satoh Bison S650
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 60.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
SatohSatoh Bison S650
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Bison S650 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
Bison S65025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; Bison S650 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +8.9 ci (+15%)CT102569.1 ci
Bison S65060.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; Bison S650 is in the 6th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Bison S650 higher · +1 (+33%)CT10253
Bison S6504
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; Bison S650 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Bison S650 higher · +617 lb (+41%)CT10251,488 lb
Bison S6502,105 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; Bison S650 is in the 13th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)Bison S650 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Satoh | — |
| Model | CT1025 | Bison S650 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mazda | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ Bison S650+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ CT1025+200 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Bison S650+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 60.2ci | ▲ CT1025+8.9 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 3in | 2.7in | ▲ CT1025+0.3 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.7in | ▲ CT1025+0.5 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 105in | ▲ Bison S650+5.7 in · +6% |
| Width | 46in | 52.9in | ▲ Bison S650+6.9 in · +15% |
| Height | 87.6in | 54.7in | ▲ CT1025+32.9 in · +60% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,105lb | ▲ Bison S650+617 lb · +41% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Satoh Bison S650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.3gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 6th percentile (60.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,105 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 12th percentile (105 in)
A · CT1025B · Bison S650Median Utility Tractor