BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Yanmar F265
YanmarModel B
Yanmar F265
Utility
- power
- 25.6 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 18
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
YanmarYanmar F265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ F265 higher · +1.1 hp (+4%)CT102524.5 hp
F26525.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; F265 is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F265 higher · +20.2 ci (+29%)CT102569.1 ci
F26589.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; F265 is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
F2653
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; F265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ F265 higher · +761 lb (+51%)CT10251,488 lb
F2652,249 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; F265 is in the 14th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)F265 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CT1025 | F265 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | 3TNB84 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25.6hp | ▲ F265+1.1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT1025+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 89.3ci | ▲ F265+20.2 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ F265+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.5in | ▲ F265+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear / Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 113in | ▲ F265+13.7 in · +14% |
| Width | 46in | 55.5in | ▲ F265+9.5 in · +21% |
| Height | 87.6in | 59.8in | ▲ CT1025+27.8 in · +46% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,249lb | ▲ F265+761 lb · +51% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,249 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 18th percentile (113 in)
A · CT1025B · F265Median Utility Tractor