BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT120
Utility
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- 56.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT120 vs Farmall 140
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall 140
Utility
- power
- 21.1 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT120
vs
FarmallFarmall 140
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 140 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)CT12021 hp
14021.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT120 is in the 9th percentile; 140 is in the 10th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 140 higher · +66.4 ci (+117%)CT12056.6 ci
140123 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT120 is in the 4th percentile; 140 is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 140 higher · +1 (+33%)CT1203
1404
Median Utility Tractor4
CT120 is in the 23rd percentile; 140 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 140 higher · +945 lb (+46%)CT1202,055 lb
1403,000 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT120 is in the 13th percentile; 140 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models
CT120 (A)140 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT120 | 140 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | International Harvester | — |
| Model | 3C093 | C-123 | — |
| Power Output | 21hp | 21.1hp | ▲ 140+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 1,400RPM | ▲ CT120+1,400 RPM · +100% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 140+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 56.6ci | 123ci | ▲ 140+66.4 ci · +117% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ 140+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 4in | ▲ 140+1.2 in · +43% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 107in | ▲ 140+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 46.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 81.5in | 83in | ▲ 140+1.5 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 2,055lb | 3,000lb | ▲ 140+945 lb · +46% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IH Fast Hitch (one-point) | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 959lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential Contracting Band | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier II | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator with two-post folding ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 9th percentile (21 hp)B · 10th percentile (21.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 4th percentile (56.6 ci)B · 30th percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,055 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,000 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (106 in)B · 14th percentile (107 in)
A · CT120B · 140Median Utility Tractor