BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT120
Utility
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- 56.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT120 vs John Deere MT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere MT
Row Crop
- power
- 20.8 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT120
vs
John DeereJohn Deere MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT120 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)CT12021 hp
MT20.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT120 is in the 9th percentile; MT is in the 9th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT higher · +44.4 ci (+78%)CT12056.6 ci
MT101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT120 is in the 4th percentile; MT is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT120 higher · +1 (+50%)CT1203
MT2
Median Utility Tractor4
CT120 is in the 23rd percentile; MT is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT higher · +1,178 lb (+57%)CT1202,055 lb
MT3,233 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT120 is in the 13th percentile; MT is in the 26th · 5,107 models
CT120 (A)MT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | John Deere | — |
| Model | CT120 | MT | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3C093 | John Deere | — |
| Power Output | 21hp | 20.8hp | ▲ CT120+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 1,650RPM | ▲ CT120+1,150 RPM · +70% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT120+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 56.6ci | 101ci | ▲ MT+44.4 ci · +78% |
| Bore | 3in | 4in | ▲ MT+1 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 4in | ▲ MT+1.2 in · +43% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 125in | ▲ MT+19 in · +18% |
| Width | 46.5in | 89.4in | ▲ MT+42.9 in · +92% |
| Height | 81.5in | 58.7in | ▲ CT120+22.8 in · +39% |
| Operating Weight | 2,055lb | 3,233lb | ▲ MT+1,178 lb · +57% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Lift Control | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 550rpm | ▲ MT+10 rpm · +2% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 959lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Single Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier II | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | John Deere MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator with two-post folding ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 9th percentile (21 hp)B · 9th percentile (20.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 4th percentile (56.6 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,055 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,233 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (106 in)B · 34th percentile (125 in)
A · CT120B · MTMedian Utility Tractor