BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT120
Utility
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- 56.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT120 vs Mitsubishi GSK210
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GSK210
Crawler
- power
- 20.7 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT120
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GSK210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT120 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)CT12021 hp
GSK21020.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT120 is in the 9th percentile; GSK210 is in the 9th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GSK210 higher · +34.8 ci (+61%)CT12056.6 ci
GSK21091.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT120 is in the 4th percentile; GSK210 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT1203
GSK2103
Median Utility Tractor4
CT120 is in the 23rd percentile; GSK210 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Width
▲ GSK210 higher · +9.8 in (+21%)CT12046.5 in
GSK21056.3 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
CT120 is in the 12th percentile; GSK210 is in the 31st · 3,933 models
CT120 (A)GSK210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT120 | GSK210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Isuzu | — |
| Model | 3C093 | E3CD | — |
| Power Output | 21hp | 20.7hp | ▲ CT120+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT120+300 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 56.6ci | 91.4ci | ▲ GSK210+34.8 ci · +61% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.4in | ▲ GSK210+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.4in | ▲ GSK210+0.6 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 46.5in | 56.3in | ▲ GSK210+9.8 in · +21% |
| Height | 81.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,055lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | 3 | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 959lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | half-track | — |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier II | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Mitsubishi GSK210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator with two-post folding ROPS | Available with ROPS or cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 9th percentile (21 hp)B · 9th percentile (20.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 4th percentile (56.6 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Width
median 66 inA · 12th percentile (46.5 in)B · 31st percentile (56.3 in)
A · CT120B · GSK210Median Utility Tractor