BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT120
Utility
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- 56.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT120 vs Yanmar FX215
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FX215
Utility
- power
- 20.7 hp
- displacement
- 85.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT120
vs
YanmarYanmar FX215
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT120 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)CT12021 hp
FX21520.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT120 is in the 9th percentile; FX215 is in the 9th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FX215 higher · +28.5 ci (+50%)CT12056.6 ci
FX21585.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT120 is in the 4th percentile; FX215 is in the 14th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT1203
FX2153
Median Utility Tractor4
CT120 is in the 23rd percentile; FX215 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT120 higher · +5 lb (<1%)CT1202,055 lb
FX2152,050 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT120 is in the 13th percentile; FX215 is in the 13th · 5,107 models
CT120 (A)FX215 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CT120 | FX215 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 3C093 | 3TNB82 | — |
| Power Output | 21hp | 20.7hp | ▲ CT120+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT120+300 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 56.6ci | 85.1ci | ▲ FX215+28.5 ci · +50% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.2in | ▲ FX215+0.2 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.5in | ▲ FX215+0.7 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 112in | ▲ FX215+6 in · +6% |
| Width | 46.5in | 48.8in | ▲ FX215+2.3 in · +5% |
| Height | 81.5in | 56.9in | ▲ CT120+24.6 in · +43% |
| Operating Weight | 2,055lb | 2,050lb | ▲ CT120+5 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 959lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier II | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT120 | Yanmar FX215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator with two-post folding ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 9th percentile (21 hp)B · 9th percentile (20.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 4th percentile (56.6 ci)B · 14th percentile (85.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,055 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,050 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (106 in)B · 17th percentile (112 in)
A · CT120B · FX215Median Utility Tractor