Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs CaseIH 1140
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH 1140
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
CaseIHCaseIH 1140
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT22527 hp
114027 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; 1140 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1140 higher · +5.9 ci (+7%)CT22585.4 ci
114091.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; 1140 is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2253
11403
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; 1140 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT225 higher · +961 lb (+47%)CT2253,021 lb
11402,060 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; 1140 is in the 13th · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)1140 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT225 | 1140 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 27hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 91.3ci | ▲ 1140+5.9 ci · +7% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 115in | ▲ CT225+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 55.5in | 53.7in | ▲ CT225+1.8 in · +3% |
| Height | 95.7in | 84.3in | ▲ CT225+11.4 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 2,060lb | ▲ CT225+961 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Open center steering flow | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type: I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Open center steering flow | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | CaseIH 1140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Open with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 19th percentile (27 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · CT225B · 1140Median Utility Tractor