Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Cub Cadet LT1050
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet LT1050
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 44.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet LT1050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT225 higher · +1 hp (+4%)CT22527 hp
LT105026 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; LT1050 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT225 higher · +41.2 ci (+93%)CT22585.4 ci
LT105044.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; LT1050 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT225 higher · +1 (+50%)CT2253
LT10502
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; LT1050 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT225 higher · +2,496 lb (+475%)CT2253,021 lb
LT1050525 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; LT1050 is in the 1st · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)LT1050 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | CT225 | LT1050 | — |
| Category | Utility | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Kohler | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Command CV730 | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 26hp | ▲ CT225+1 hp · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT225+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 44.2ci | ▲ CT225+41.2 ci · +93% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 2.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 68.1in | ▲ CT225+49.9 in · +73% |
| Width | 55.5in | 54in | ▲ CT225+1.5 in · +3% |
| Height | 95.7in | 42.9in | ▲ CT225+52.8 in · +123% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 525lb | ▲ CT225+2,496 lb · +475% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Independent with Electric Clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Dry Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Open Operator Station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 2nd percentile (44.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 1st percentile (525 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 1st percentile (68.1 in)
A · CT225B · LT1050Median Utility Tractor