Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Farmall F-20
FarmallModel B
Farmall F-20
Row Crop
- power
- 26.7 hp
- displacement
- 221 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
FarmallFarmall F-20
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT225 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)CT22527 hp
F-2026.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; F-20 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F-20 higher · +136 ci (+159%)CT22585.4 ci
F-20221 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; F-20 is in the 61st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ F-20 higher · +1 (+33%)CT2253
F-204
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; F-20 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ F-20 higher · +1,379 lb (+46%)CT2253,021 lb
F-204,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; F-20 is in the 42nd · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)F-20 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT225 | F-20 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Not recorded | International Harvester | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 26.7hp | ▲ CT225+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ F-20+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 221ci | ▲ F-20+136 ci · +159% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.8in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 140in | ▲ F-20+22 in · +19% |
| Width | 55.5in | 85.8in | ▲ F-20+30.3 in · +55% |
| Height | 95.7in | 66.9in | ▲ CT225+28.8 in · +43% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 4,400lb | ▲ F-20+1,379 lb · +46% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ CT225+1,460 rpm · +270% |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Mechanical band | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 10gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 18th percentile (26.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 61st percentile (221 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 42nd percentile (4,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 55th percentile (140 in)
A · CT225B · F-20Median Utility Tractor