Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Farmall F-235
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall F-235
Sub-Compact
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
FarmallFarmall F-235
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT225 higher · +1 hp (+4%)CT22527 hp
F-23526 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; F-235 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F-235 higher · +37.6 ci (+44%)CT22585.4 ci
F-235123 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; F-235 is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ F-235 higher · +1 (+33%)CT2253
F-2354
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; F-235 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ F-235 higher · +629 lb (+21%)CT2253,021 lb
F-2353,650 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; F-235 is in the 31st · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)F-235 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT225 | F-235 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | International Harvester | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 26hp | ▲ CT225+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,650RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ F-235+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 123ci | ▲ F-235+37.6 ci · +44% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 131in | ▲ F-235+13 in · +11% |
| Width | 55.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 95.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 3,650lb | ▲ F-235+629 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.00x15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 10.00x36 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall F-235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 30th percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 31st percentile (3,650 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 42nd percentile (131 in)
A · CT225B · F-235Median Utility Tractor