Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Farmall Super C
FarmallModel B
Farmall Super C
Row Crop
- power
- 25.9 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
FarmallFarmall Super C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT225 higher · +1.1 hp (+4%)CT22527 hp
Super C25.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; Super C is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Super C higher · +37.6 ci (+44%)CT22585.4 ci
Super C123 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; Super C is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Super C higher · +1 (+33%)CT2253
Super C4
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; Super C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Super C higher · +79 lb (+3%)CT2253,021 lb
Super C3,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; Super C is in the 24th · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)Super C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT225 | Super C | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C123 | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 25.9hp | ▲ CT225+1.1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,650RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Super C+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 123ci | ▲ Super C+37.6 ci · +44% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 123in | ▲ Super C+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 55.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 95.7in | 74.8in | ▲ CT225+20.9 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 3,100lb | ▲ Super C+79 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Rear | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ CT225+1,460 rpm · +270% |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Fast Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Farmall Super C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 30th percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,100 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 32nd percentile (123 in)
A · CT225B · Super CMedian Utility Tractor