Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Mitsubishi GO280
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GO280
Utility
- power
- 27.6 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GO280
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GO280 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)CT22527 hp
GO28027.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; GO280 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GO280 higher · +21.6 ci (+25%)CT22585.4 ci
GO280107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; GO280 is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GO280 higher · +1 (+33%)CT2253
GO2804
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; GO280 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT225 higher · +111 lb (+4%)CT2253,021 lb
GO2802,910 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; GO280 is in the 21st · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)GO280 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT225 | GO280 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S4L2 | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 27.6hp | ▲ GO280+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ GO280+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 107ci | ▲ GO280+21.6 ci · +25% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 124in | ▲ GO280+6 in · +5% |
| Width | 55.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 95.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 2,910lb | ▲ CT225+111 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2-26 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | JISI | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GO280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 21st percentile (2,910 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 32nd percentile (124 in)
A · CT225B · GO280Median Utility Tractor