Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Mitsubishi GSK255
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GSK255
Crawler
- power
- 26.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GSK255
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT225 higher · +0.8 hp (+3%)CT22527 hp
GSK25526.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; GSK255 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GSK255 higher · +6 ci (+7%)CT22585.4 ci
GSK25591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; GSK255 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2253
GSK2553
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; GSK255 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Width
▲ GSK255 higher · +0.8 in (+1%)CT22555.5 in
GSK25556.3 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
CT225 is in the 28th percentile; GSK255 is in the 31st · 3,933 models
CT225 (A)GSK255 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT225 | GSK255 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Isuzu | — |
| Model | Not recorded | E3CD | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 26.2hp | ▲ CT225+0.8 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 91.4ci | ▲ GSK255+6 ci · +7% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 55.5in | 56.3in | ▲ GSK255+0.8 in · +1% |
| Height | 95.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | half-track | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 18th percentile (26.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Width
median 66 inA · 28th percentile (55.5 in)B · 31st percentile (56.3 in)
A · CT225B · GSK255Median Utility Tractor