Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Mitsubishi MT271
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT271
Utility
- power
- 26.7 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT271
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT225 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)CT22527 hp
MT27126.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; MT271 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT271 higher · +6.1 ci (+7%)CT22585.4 ci
MT27191.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; MT271 is in the 20th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT271 higher · +1 (+33%)CT2253
MT2714
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT271 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT225 higher · +111 lb (+4%)CT2253,021 lb
MT2712,910 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT271 is in the 21st · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)MT271 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT225 | MT271 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S4L | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 26.7hp | ▲ CT225+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT271+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 91.5ci | ▲ MT271+6.1 ci · +7% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 124in | ▲ MT271+6 in · +5% |
| Width | 55.5in | 54.7in | ▲ CT225+0.8 in · +1% |
| Height | 95.7in | 77.4in | ▲ CT225+18.3 in · +24% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 2,910lb | ▲ CT225+111 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT271 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | ROPS or Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 18th percentile (26.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 21st percentile (2,910 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 32nd percentile (124 in)
A · CT225B · MT271Median Utility Tractor