Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Mitsubishi MT28
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT28
Utility
- power
- 27.6 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT28
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT28 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)CT22527 hp
MT2827.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; MT28 is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT225 higher · +5 ci (+6%)CT22585.4 ci
MT2880.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; MT28 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2253
MT283
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT28 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT225 higher · +442 lb (+17%)CT2253,021 lb
MT282,579 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT28 is in the 18th · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)MT28 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT225 | MT28 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 27.6hp | ▲ MT28+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 80.4ci | ▲ CT225+5 ci · +6% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 126in | ▲ MT28+8 in · +7% |
| Width | 55.5in | 55.1in | ▲ CT225+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 95.7in | 93.9in | ▲ CT225+1.8 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 2,579lb | ▲ CT225+442 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type: I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 20th percentile (27.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 18th percentile (2,579 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 35th percentile (126 in)
A · CT225B · MT28Median Utility Tractor