Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs Yanmar EF328V
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar EF328V
Utility
- power
- 27.6 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
YanmarYanmar EF328V
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ EF328V higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)CT22527 hp
EF328V27.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; EF328V is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ EF328V higher · +5.9 ci (+7%)CT22585.4 ci
EF328V91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; EF328V is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2253
EF328V3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; EF328V is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT225 higher · +45 lb (+2%)CT2253,021 lb
EF328V2,976 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; EF328V is in the 22nd · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)EF328V (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CT225 | EF328V | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNV84 | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 27.6hp | ▲ EF328V+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 91.3ci | ▲ EF328V+5.9 ci · +7% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 121in | ▲ EF328V+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 55.5in | 55.7in | ▲ EF328V+0.2 in · <1% |
| Height | 95.7in | 77.6in | ▲ CT225+18.1 in · +23% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 2,976lb | ▲ CT225+45 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16-Jul | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-26 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | JIS1 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | Yanmar EF328V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 22nd percentile (2,976 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · CT225B · EF328VMedian Utility Tractor