Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT230
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT230 vs McCormick-Deering FU237
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering FU237
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 128 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
BobcatBobcat CT230
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering FU237
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT23030 hp
FU23730 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT230 is in the 22nd percentile; FU237 is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FU237 higher · +36.5 ci (+40%)CT23091.5 ci
FU237128 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT230 is in the 20th percentile; FU237 is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FU237 higher · +1 (+33%)CT2303
FU2374
Median Utility Tractor4
CT230 is in the 23rd percentile; FU237 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ FU237 higher · +18 lb (<1%)CT2303,056 lb
FU2373,074 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT230 is in the 23rd percentile; FU237 is in the 24th · 5,107 models
CT230 (A)FU237 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | CT230 | FU237 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Not recorded | FD 128 | — |
| Power Output | 30hp | 30hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,800RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ FU237+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.5ci | 128ci | ▲ FU237+36.5 ci · +40% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 115in | ▲ CT230+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 55.9in | 67.7in | ▲ FU237+11.8 in · +21% |
| Height | 95.9in | 60.6in | ▲ CT230+35.3 in · +58% |
| Operating Weight | 3,056lb | 3,074lb | ▲ FU237+18 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live Rear PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | McCormick-Deering FU237 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 22nd percentile (30 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)B · 30th percentile (128 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,056 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,074 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 21st percentile (115 in)
A · CT230B · FU237Median Utility Tractor