Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT230
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT230 vs Yanmar EF312T
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar EF312T
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BobcatBobcat CT230
vs
YanmarYanmar EF312T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT23030 hp
EF312T30 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT230 is in the 22nd percentile; EF312T is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT230 higher · +0.2 ci (<1%)CT23091.5 ci
EF312T91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT230 is in the 20th percentile; EF312T is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2303
EF312T3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT230 is in the 23rd percentile; EF312T is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT230 higher · +1,028 lb (+51%)CT2303,056 lb
EF312T2,028 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT230 is in the 23rd percentile; EF312T is in the 12th · 5,107 models
CT230 (A)EF312T (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CT230 | EF312T | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNV84 | — |
| Power Output | 30hp | 30hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.5ci | 91.3ci | ▲ CT230+0.2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Shuttle (synchro-mech) with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 112in | ▲ CT230+6 in · +5% |
| Width | 55.9in | 52in | ▲ CT230+3.9 in · +7% |
| Height | 95.9in | 53.5in | ▲ CT230+42.4 in · +79% |
| Operating Weight | 3,056lb | 2,028lb | ▲ CT230+1,028 lb · +51% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live Rear PTO | Continuous | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,205lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 22nd percentile (30 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,056 lb)B · 12th percentile (2,028 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 17th percentile (112 in)
A · CT230B · EF312TMedian Utility Tractor