Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT235
Utility
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 97.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT235 vs Bobcat CT335
BobcatModel B
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT235
vs
BobcatBobcat CT335
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT335 higher · +4 hp (+12%)CT23534 hp
CT33538 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT235 is in the 26th percentile; CT335 is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT335 higher · +12.4 ci (+13%)CT23597.6 ci
CT335110 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT235 is in the 22nd percentile; CT335 is in the 26th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2353
CT3353
Median Utility Tractor4
CT235 is in the 23rd percentile; CT335 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT335 higher · +612 lb (+20%)CT2353,056 lb
CT3353,668 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT235 is in the 23rd percentile; CT335 is in the 32nd · 5,107 models
CT235 (A)CT335 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Bobcat | Same |
| Model | CT235 | CT335 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Daedong | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | 3B183 | — |
| Power Output | 34hp | 38hp | ▲ CT335+4 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 97.6ci | 110ci | ▲ CT335+12.4 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 129in | ▲ CT335+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 55.4in | 62.6in | ▲ CT335+7.2 in · +13% |
| Height | 95.9in | 63.4in | ▲ CT235+32.5 in · +51% |
| Ground Clearance | 9.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,056lb | 3,668lb | ▲ CT335+612 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Middle (Optional), Rear (Live) | Independent Rear | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ CT235+1,460 rpm · +270% |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,700lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 (MFWD) | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Integral wet disc | Differential Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | Bobcat CT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 26th percentile (34 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 22nd percentile (97.6 ci)B · 26th percentile (110 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,056 lb)B · 32nd percentile (3,668 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 31st percentile (122 in)B · 39th percentile (129 in)
A · CT235B · CT335Median Utility Tractor