Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT235
Utility
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 97.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT235 vs McCormick Intl X10.35M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.35M
Utility
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BobcatBobcat CT235
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.35M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT23534 hp
X10.35M34 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT235 is in the 26th percentile; X10.35M is in the 26th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.35M higher · +3.4 ci (+3%)CT23597.6 ci
X10.35M101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT235 is in the 22nd percentile; X10.35M is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2353
X10.35M3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT235 is in the 23rd percentile; X10.35M is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.35M higher · +95 lb (+3%)CT2353,056 lb
X10.35M3,151 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT235 is in the 23rd percentile; X10.35M is in the 25th · 5,107 models
CT235 (A)X10.35M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | CT235 | X10.35M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Daedong | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | 3A165 | — |
| Power Output | 34hp | 34hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 97.6ci | 101ci | ▲ X10.35M+3.4 ci · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 122in | Same |
| Width | 55.4in | 54.6in | ▲ CT235+0.8 in · +1% |
| Height | 95.9in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.35M+0.9 in · <1% |
| Ground Clearance | 9.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,056lb | 3,151lb | ▲ X10.35M+95 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Middle (Optional), Rear (Live) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 (MFWD) | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Integral wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT235 | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 26th percentile (34 hp)B · 26th percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 22nd percentile (97.6 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,056 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,151 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 31st percentile (122 in)B · 31st percentile (122 in)
A · CT235B · X10.35MMedian Utility Tractor