BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs John Deere 4005
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 4005
Utility
- power
- 37.9 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 4005
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT335 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)CT33538 hp
400537.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; 4005 is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 4005 higher · +24 ci (+22%)CT335110 ci
4005134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT335 is in the 26th percentile; 4005 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 4005 higher · +1 (+33%)CT3353
40054
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; 4005 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT335 higher · +714 lb (+24%)CT3353,668 lb
40052,954 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT335 is in the 32nd percentile; 4005 is in the 22nd · 5,107 models
CT335 (A)4005 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | John Deere | — |
| Model | CT335 | 4005 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 3B183 | 4TNV88 | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 37.9hp | ▲ CT335+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ 4005+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 4005+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 110ci | 134ci | ▲ 4005+24 ci · +22% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.5in | ▲ 4005+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4in | 3.5in | ▲ CT335+0.5 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 124in | ▲ CT335+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 62.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | 84.6in | ▲ 4005+21.2 in · +33% |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | 2,954lb | ▲ CT335+714 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Continuous | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | 2,020lb | ▲ 4005+320 lb · +19% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 4005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (37.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (110 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,668 lb)B · 22nd percentile (2,954 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 32nd percentile (124 in)
A · CT335B · 4005Median Utility Tractor