BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs John Deere 40C
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 40C
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 40C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT33538 hp
40C38 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; 40C is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT335 higher · +9 ci (+9%)CT335110 ci
40C101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT335 is in the 26th percentile; 40C is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT335 higher · +1 (+50%)CT3353
40C2
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; 40C is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 40C higher · +832 lb (+23%)CT3353,668 lb
40C4,500 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT335 is in the 32nd percentile; 40C is in the 43rd · 5,107 models
CT335 (A)40C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | John Deere | — |
| Model | CT335 | 40C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3B183 | LDW 1603 | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 38hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 1,850RPM | ▲ CT335+750 RPM · +41% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT335+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 110ci | 101ci | ▲ CT335+9 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 4in | ▲ 40C+0.6 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 121in | ▲ CT335+8 in · +7% |
| Width | 62.6in | 43.4in | ▲ CT335+19.2 in · +44% |
| Height | 63.4in | 78.7in | ▲ 40C+15.3 in · +24% |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | 4,500lb | ▲ 40C+832 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type: I/IN | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | John Deere 40C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (110 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,668 lb)B · 43rd percentile (4,500 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · CT335B · 40CMedian Utility Tractor