BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs Mahindra 4010
MahindraModel B
Mahindra 4010
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
MahindraMahindra 4010
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT33538 hp
401038 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; 4010 is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 4010 higher · +1 ci (<1%)CT335110 ci
4010111 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT335 is in the 26th percentile; 4010 is in the 26th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT3353
40103
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; 4010 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT335 higher · +603 lb (+20%)CT3353,668 lb
40103,065 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT335 is in the 32nd percentile; 4010 is in the 24th · 5,107 models
CT335 (A)4010 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mahindra | — |
| Model | CT335 | 4010 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Daedong | Same |
| Model | 3B183 | 3B183LW | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 38hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 110ci | 111ci | ▲ 4010+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 4in | 4in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | Constant mesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 119in | ▲ CT335+10 in · +8% |
| Width | 62.6in | 59.8in | ▲ CT335+2.8 in · +5% |
| Height | 63.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | 3,065lb | ▲ CT335+603 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 8x16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4x24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Mahindra 4010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (110 ci)B · 26th percentile (111 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,668 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,065 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 26th percentile (119 in)
A · CT335B · 4010Median Utility Tractor