BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs Massey Ferguson 231
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 231
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 152 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 231
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT33538 hp
23138 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; 231 is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 231 higher · +42 ci (+38%)CT335110 ci
231152 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT335 is in the 26th percentile; 231 is in the 39th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT3353
2313
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; 231 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 231 higher · +400 lb (+11%)CT3353,668 lb
2314,068 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT335 is in the 32nd percentile; 231 is in the 38th · 5,107 models
CT335 (A)231 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | CT335 | 231 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3B183 | AD3.152 | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 38hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ CT335+600 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 110ci | 152ci | ▲ 231+42 ci · +38% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.6in | ▲ 231+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4in | 5in | ▲ 231+1 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 128in | ▲ CT335+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 62.6in | 76in | ▲ 231+13.4 in · +21% |
| Height | 63.4in | 87.4in | ▲ 231+24 in · +38% |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | 4,068lb | ▲ 231+400 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power assist | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Drum | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Massey Ferguson 231 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (110 ci)B · 39th percentile (152 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,668 lb)B · 38th percentile (4,068 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 38th percentile (128 in)
A · CT335B · 231Median Utility Tractor