BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs Satoh Stallion S750
Image not recorded
SatohModel B
Satoh Stallion S750
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 108 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
SatohSatoh Stallion S750
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT33538 hp
Stallion S75038 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; Stallion S750 is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT335 higher · +2 ci (+2%)CT335110 ci
Stallion S750108 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT335 is in the 26th percentile; Stallion S750 is in the 26th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT3353
Stallion S7503
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; Stallion S750 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ CT335 higher · +14 in (+12%)CT335129 in
Stallion S750115 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
CT335 is in the 39th percentile; Stallion S750 is in the 21st · 4,659 models
CT335 (A)Stallion S750 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Satoh | — |
| Model | CT335 | Stallion S750 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Isuzu | — |
| Model | 3B183 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 38hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT335+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 110ci | 108ci | ▲ CT335+2 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 4in | 4in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 115in | ▲ CT335+14 in · +12% |
| Width | 62.6in | 65.6in | ▲ Stallion S750+3 in · +5% |
| Height | 63.4in | 77.8in | ▲ Stallion S750+14.4 in · +23% |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power assist | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Satoh Stallion S750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (110 ci)B · 26th percentile (108 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 21st percentile (115 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 42nd percentile (62.6 in)B · 49th percentile (65.6 in)
A · CT335B · Stallion S750Median Utility Tractor