BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs Ursus 2812
Image not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
UrsusUrsus 2812
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT33538 hp
281238 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; 2812 is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2812 higher · +43 ci (+39%)CT335110 ci
2812153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT335 is in the 26th percentile; 2812 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT3353
28123
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; 2812 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2812 higher · +455 lb (+12%)CT3353,668 lb
28124,123 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT335 is in the 32nd percentile; 2812 is in the 38th · 5,107 models
CT335 (A)2812 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Ursus | — |
| Model | CT335 | 2812 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Ursus | — |
| Model | 3B183 | 3250 | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 38hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ CT335+600 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 110ci | 153ci | ▲ 2812+43 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.6in | ▲ 2812+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4in | 5in | ▲ 2812+1 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 128in | ▲ CT335+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 62.6in | 71.7in | ▲ 2812+9.1 in · +15% |
| Height | 63.4in | 96.1in | ▲ 2812+32.7 in · +52% |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | 4,123lb | ▲ 2812+455 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | 2,932lb | ▲ 2812+1,232 lb · +72% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Ursus 2812 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (110 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,668 lb)B · 38th percentile (4,123 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 39th percentile (128 in)
A · CT335B · 2812Median Utility Tractor