BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs Zetor M40
Image not recorded
ZetorModel B
Zetor M40
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
ZetorZetor M40
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT33538 hp
M4038 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; M40 is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT3353
M403
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; M40 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
CT335 (A)M40 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Zetor | — |
| Model | CT335 | M40 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 3B183 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 38hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 110ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 62.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | Zetor M40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · CT335B · M40Median Utility Tractor