Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT4050
Utility
- power
- 50.3 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT4050 vs John Deere 1035
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 1035
Utility
- power
- 50.3 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BobcatBobcat CT4050
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 1035
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT405050.3 hp
103550.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT4050 is in the 46th percentile; 1035 is in the 46th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1035 higher · +54 ci (+49%)CT4050111 ci
1035165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT4050 is in the 26th percentile; 1035 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT40503
10353
Median Utility Tractor4
CT4050 is in the 23rd percentile; 1035 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedCT40508
10358
Median Utility Tractor12
CT4050 is in the 23rd percentile; 1035 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
CT4050 (A)1035 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | John Deere | — |
| Model | CT4050 | 1035 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | John Deere | — |
| Model | Daedong 3FT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 50.3hp | 50.3hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 111ci | 165ci | ▲ 1035+54 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 4in | ▲ 1035+0.6 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.3in | ▲ 1035+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 8-speed synchronized shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 63in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 96.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,373lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT4050 | John Deere 1035 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.6gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 46th percentile (50.3 hp)B · 46th percentile (50.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (111 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
A · CT4050B · 1035Median Utility Tractor