Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT4058
Utility
- power
- 57.7 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT4058 vs CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II
Utility
- power
- 55 hp
- displacement
- 115 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
BobcatBobcat CT4058
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 55C Series II
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT4058 higher · +2.7 hp (+5%)CT405857.7 hp
Farmall 55C Series II55 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT4058 is in the 52nd percentile; Farmall 55C Series II is in the 50th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 55C Series II higher · +4 ci (+4%)CT4058111 ci
Farmall 55C Series II115 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT4058 is in the 26th percentile; Farmall 55C Series II is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT40583
Farmall 55C Series II3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT4058 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 55C Series II is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall 55C Series II higher · +247 lb (+7%)CT40583,523 lb
Farmall 55C Series II3,770 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT4058 is in the 30th percentile; Farmall 55C Series II is in the 33rd · 5,107 models
CT4058 (A)Farmall 55C Series II (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT4058 | Farmall 55C Series II | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | LS Mtron | — |
| Model | Daedong 3FT | L3C19-T | — |
| Power Output | 57.7hp | 55hp | ▲ CT4058+2.7 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 111ci | 115ci | ▲ Farmall 55C Series II+4 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.5in | ▲ Farmall 55C Series II+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ Farmall 55C Series II+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 63in | 69.1in | ▲ Farmall 55C Series II+6.1 in · +10% |
| Height | 96.8in | 98.4in | ▲ Farmall 55C Series II+1.6 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,523lb | 3,770lb | ▲ Farmall 55C Series II+247 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | CaseIH Farmall 55C Series II | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (57.7 hp)B · 50th percentile (55 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (111 ci)B · 28th percentile (115 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 30th percentile (3,523 lb)B · 33rd percentile (3,770 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 43rd percentile (63 in)B · 58th percentile (69.1 in)
A · CT4058B · Farmall 55C Series IIMedian Utility Tractor